Content material of the fabric
- KIA Telluride vs. Toyota Highlander Size and Practicality
- Fuel Economy and Real-World MPG
- Highlander vs. 4Runner: Off-road capabilities
- TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VS. KIA TELLURIDE TECH AND FEATURES
- Highlander vs. 4Runner: Passenger and cargo space (Which is bigger?)
- Warranty and Maintenance Coverage
KIA Telluride vs. Toyota Highlander Measurement and Practicality
Three rows of seating and the flexibility to seat eight occupants are the primary important similarities when evaluating the 2022 Toyota Highlander vs. 2022 Kia Telluride. Legroom and headroom are the place the battle begins. The 2022 Telluride has 40.9 inches of headroom (and not using a sunroof geared up) and 41.4 inches of legroom for the primary row of seating. The 2022 Highlander wins this spherical, with 41.2 inches and 42 inches, respectively. But the Telluride wins for second-row spaciousness, with 40.2 inches of headroom and 42.4 inches of legroom, towards the Highlander specs of 39.4 and 41 inches, respectively.
The Telluride wins the inside spaciousness battle two-to-one, ending with the third row that gives 38.1 inches of headroom together with 31.4 inches of legroom. That is towards 36.1 inches and 27.7 inches for the Highlander. General, the 2022 Telluride presents 178.1 cubic ft of passenger quantity, whereas the Highlander presents as much as 141.3 cubic ft.
Cargo area is comparable, as a new Kia Telluride presents 21 cubic ft behind the third row, whereas the 2022 Highlander presents 16 cubic ft in the identical space. Most cargo quantity is available in at as much as 87 cubic ft on a Telluride, whereas a Highlander presents as much as 84.3 cubic ft. In the meantime, when evaluating Kia Telluride and Toyota Highlander towing capability, each provide as much as 5,000 lbs most towing capabilities when correctly geared up.
Gasoline Economic system and Actual-World MPG
Thus far, Toyota has solely mentioned that the brand new turbocharged engine is sweet for twenty-four mpg mixed, so we don’t know what its metropolis and freeway rankings are. Hybrid fashions will undoubtedly carry larger rankings than the gasoline-only model, with front-wheel-drive variants incomes 36 mpg within the metropolis and 35 mpg on the freeway. When the Highlander visits our workplace, we’ll be placing its gasoline effectivity to the take a look at on our 75-mph highway fuel economy test route and updating this story with outcomes. For extra details about the Highlander’s gasoline economic system, go to the EPA’s website.
Highlander vs. 4Runner: Off-road capabilities
The 4Runner has a definitive benefit for off-road capabilities. For one, it has a better floor clearance than the Highlander (as much as 9.6 vs. 8.0 inches). Additionally, it has a extra succesful four-wheel drive system with an out there switch case, in comparison with the fundamental all-wheel drive system for the Highlander. Moreover, not like the Highlander, the 4Runner presents an off-road-focused mannequin with the TRD Professional, which incorporates off-road options like all-terrain tires, off-road drive modes, and an off-road-tuned suspension.
TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VS. KIA TELLURIDE TECH AND FEATURES
Whereas it is considerably subjective, many professional reviewers discover that when evaluating a Kia SUV vs. Toyota SUV, the extra futuristic, refined, and splendid feeling interiors belong to Kia fashions — particularly the Telluride. Luxurious feeling apart, you may additionally discover extra tech in each new and used Kia Telluride for sale. A normal 10.25-inch touchscreen infotainment system for the Telluride beats the usual 8-inch unit within the Highlander. Normal on each is Apple CarPlay® and Android Auto™ connectivity.
Six customary USB ports on the Telluride beat the usual 5 a Highlander presents. Each have out there heated/ventilated entrance seats. Each have out there captain’s chairs. The tech and have comparability could be very comparable between the 2. But, the Telluride wins the affordability battle with a decrease beginning worth than the Highlander.
Highlander vs. 4Runner: Passenger and cargo area (Which is greater?)
When deciding between the Highlander and 4Runner, one of the frequent questions that potential patrons ask is, “Which one is greater?” When it comes to exterior dimensions, the Highlander is barely larger than the 4Runner, with an extended wheelbase and total size. This bigger dimension ends in a extra spacious inside for the Highlander. It has a complete passenger quantity of 141.3 cu-ft, in comparison with 128.0 cu-ft for the 4Runner three-row mannequin and 93.7 cu-ft for the two-row mannequin.
Nonetheless, the 4Runner has extra space for storing. It has a most cargo capability of 89.7 cu-ft, in comparison with 84.3 cu-ft for the Highlander.
Guarantee and Upkeep Protection
Toyota’s guarantee protection adheres to the norm of the phase; nevertheless, patrons get two years of complimentary scheduled upkeep, which is a pleasant perk that the majority rivals do not provide. The electrified Highlander comes with a separate hybrid-component guarantee that gives eight years or 100,000 miles of protection.
- Restricted guarantee covers three years or 36,000 miles
- Powertrain guarantee covers 5 years or 60,000 miles
- Hybrid-component guarantee covers eight years or 100,000 miles
- Complimentary upkeep is roofed for 2 years or 25,000 miles
Specs 2020 Toyota Highlander Platinum AWD VEHICLE TYPE front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE AS TESTED $51,068 (base worth: $49,975) POWERTRAIN DOHC 16-valve Atkinson-cycle 2.5-liter inline -4, 186 hp, 175 lb-ft + 3 permanent-magnet synchronous AC motors; mixed output, 243 hp TRANSMISSION repeatedly variable automated CHASSIS Suspension (F/R): struts/multilink Brakes (F/R): 13.3-in vented disc/13.3-in vented disc Tires: Goodyear Eagle Touring, 235/55R-20 102V M+S DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 112.2 in Size: 194.9 in Width: 76.0 in Top: 68.1 in Passenger quantity: 135 ft3 Cargo quantity: 16 ft3 Curb weight: 4615 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 7.3 sec 100 mph: 21.9 sec Rolling begin, 5–60 mph: 7.8 sec High gear, 30–50 mph: 3.9 sec High gear, 50–70 mph: 5.2 sec 1/4 mile: 16.0 sec @ 87 mph High pace (governor restricted): 118 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.82 g Standing-start accel instances omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. C/D FUEL ECONOMY Noticed: 29 mpg EPA FUEL ECONOMY Mixed/metropolis/freeway: 35/35/35 mpg